2008-08-13

Origins of Ventress

From here, a note from Dave Filoni (producer of the new Clone Wars CGI stuff) about the origins of Asajj Ventress. Given that I've already heard uninformed suggestions that she's an EU character so George is gung-ho for the EU, here's a bit of extra info to again demonstrate how uninformed such opinions are:

"Ventress was a character that was actually developed for early concept art for Attack of the Clones. There was the idea that maybe the Sith apprentice, the new one after Darth Maul, would be a girl. That got abandoned eventually in favor of Count Dooku, Christopher Lee's character. But the concept art existed. And the comic books and novels of The Clone Wars that were done, had utilized that character, that concept art and created this new character...so when it came time to develop the idea of The Clone Wars as a series, we thought, well, that's a big fan favorite character. So let's draw her out. And it just so happened that we were introducing Ahsoka at the same time, so here you have these two new girls coming into this story at the same time, which there's actually kind of an advantage to. Because you have one that's the apprentice of Anakin Skywalker, trying to train in the traditional ways of a Jedi, and that's the hidden apprentice of Count Dooku, who's the evil, opposite end. So that actually works really nicely for the story that we're trying to tell."

2 Comments:

Blogger Stuart Ian Burns said...

Sorry about leaving this in the comments but the contact link on the sidebar isn't working.

Having read some of the blog and website and the mess which appears to be the Star Wars Expanded Universe, I wondered what you thought of the concept of canon in Doctor Who. The wikipedia entry offers a decent commentary:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Who_canon

This offers a raw list of what's in and out:

http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Canon

But the upshot of it is that everything is canon if you want it to be. Apart from the charity episode 'Dimensions in Time' because it's rubbish (I suspect the Holiday Special would be the Wars equivalent). Luckily, since Doctor Who is a time travel series which happens sometimes in different dimensions even when its horrendously contradicting itself, such things can be explained away because of temporal anomalies and timey-wimey, though our own chronology of the Whoniverse:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Ahistory-Unauthorised-History-Doctor-Universe/dp/0975944665

Which blissfully gets itself tied up in knots trying to rationalise the unrationalisable. I don't get us started on the UNIT controversy. But really despite having a potentially far more complex universe to play about with, canonicity in Doctor Who seems far easier to deal with than Star Wars.

Further reading:

Script writer Paul Cornell (nominated lately for a Hugo) writes about the concept of the personal canon:
http://paulcornell.blogspot.com/2007/02/canonicity-in-doctor-who.html

10:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Like Stuart, I must also apologize for leaving this in the comment box. Your contact information, after all, is not canon.

I've just written a five-part piece on the cottage industry of media tie-in novels that may interest you. Part 4 is where I specifically dive into the subject of Star Wars canon. My belief is that a monolithic continuity, as much as the fans who want to "know more" seem to love it, is fundamentally stultifying and responsible for confining the books to a second-rate morass. I'd be pleased to hear what you think.

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5

6:05 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home